Cost of the Death Penalty Essay -- essays research papers

Costs and Consequences of the devastation Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the stopping point penalization. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the shoemakers last penalisation, a review of how the expiration punishment process is drop deading today, questions on whether or not if the end penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is middling applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the publics support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and election to the death penalty. to each nonpareil of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty provoke work against out society rather than for it.Costanzo concludes there are four-spot dilutes throughout the history of the death penalty. First, he be lieves there has been a spectacular shrinking in the number and types of crimes punish qualified by death. At one point in early colonial times, he argues that there were oer fifty crimes fit for death, including vagrancy and petty theft. He believes there is a trend that attempts to lessen the cruelty of executions. by means of the tests and reviews of past methods of killing, each one gets a little more humane, as the Supreme Court puts it. The tierce trend mentioned attempts to make the death penalty imposed fairly and rationally. Through the revised process of how it is imposed, to the choice of death in the jurys deliberations, there have been drastic changes in how we chose the practice this method of punishment. Lastly, the after part trend is the sanitizing of executions (conducted late at night and using well-defined and vary procedures). Although this may run side by side with the revision of the death penalty process, Costanzo explains that there is a difference bet ween the reasons why we chose the death penalty in cases, which is the revision discussed in trend number 3, and the revision of how it is carried out, which is the fourth. The practices have come along way, but if history proves true, Costanzo argues, there entrust be a new way of doing it in the not so distant future, which pull up stakes be called more humane and fit for use in our penal system.Costanzo sites the two landmark decisions of the Supreme Court. Furman vs. Georgia (1972) command that capital ... ...wn government put people to death, the more likely they will be to use death in their own world. Also, he believes the designate shows those who currently support the death penalty would favor other(a) types of alternatives if devoted the option and explanation. Largely he believes people want justice and cull the death penalty due to a lack of any other sure way to keep the dangerous criminals off the street. Costanzo suggests workable alternatives to the death sen tence i.e., life without parole plus restitution. He believes the public would readily support this if the option was provided and explained. In conclusion, Costanzo believes that the death penalty does not work and should be abolished. He supports his position by thoroughly explaining the history of the death penalty and gives numerous arguments that support that no legal system is able to infallibility and evenhandedly decide who should live and who should die. He points out that those who support it do so in the abstract and that when given a better alternative to ensure the public safety, alternatives that offer punishment without the taking of lives would be preferent over ones that do.