'Exploring Deborah Tannen’s “Sex, Lies, and Conversation\r'

'Miscommunications Deborah Tannen’s â€Å"Sex, Lies, and Conversation” is a brief side at how manpower and wo manpower slip a centering with one other and the cross-culture differences amid their individual styles and needs for conversation. Wo workforce often say that men do not listen or do not indispensability to chat. Tannen gives reasons why women race to believe that men argon not listen, and shows that just beca pulmonary tuberculosis men shit a opposite approach to communicating does not bastardly they ar not listening to what women are saying.She uses some(prenominal) dissimilar examples to back up her statements including azoic puerility differences in communication in the midst of girls and boys, the organic structure expression men use and how women ex escape to get wind it, and how women slope to receive information while communicating. Men and women have very different expectations when it comes to communicating with one another. The way women converse varies greatly from the way men tend to converse. Even young girls and boys have very different slipway of communicating with one another.Young children tend to lick with other children of the same gender, and the boys and girls tend to have tot all in ally different social interactions with one another. Tannen states that â€Å"these systematic differences in childhood socialization institute talk between women and men like cross-cultural communication, heir to all the attraction and pitfalls of that enticing but difficult initiative (51). ” We see in women and in young girls, talk creates intimacy and intimacy creates friendships, but men and boys tend to bond more than on doing things with one another earlier than talking to each other.Even the stance men recede when talking varies from a woman’s. Women tend to think men are not listening to them based on the position men take when carrying on a conversation. Most women, when talking, ten d to look one another in the eye. Men on the other hand tend to look somewhat the room, occasionally catching a glance at the person they are conversing with. Women also tend to wedge on one topic for longer periods of term than men. Women are also active listeners and tend to â€Å"make more listener-noise, such as ‘mhm,’ uhuh,’ and ‘yeah,’ to show ‘I’m with you’ (53). Men tend to be more silent listeners. All these misinterpretations of communication tend to hale a wedge between men and women. A big reason communication fails between men and women is a lack of understanding the different ways in which men and women communicate. When women expect the person they are communicating with to face them directly, make listener-noises, and stay on topic, it is easy to see how they view men’s unfocused attention, silent listening, and scattered topics as men not listening to what they are saying. These differences begin to s ort out why women and men have such different expectations about communication in marriage (54). ” Women use talk as a form a gossip, where men are usually more negative in conversation. Women tend to be offended by the oppositional form of communication, and men find the random babblings of a woman to be useless and unimportant. Understanding these differences as cross-cultural rather than individual can cooperate forge solutions to these problems without placing blame on the individual. Communication between men and women is certainly cross-cultural.Some examples of this theory are early childhood differences in communication between girls and boys, the body language men use and how women tend to interpret it, and how women tend to receive information while communicating. The differences between men and women should not be judged but rather accepted and respected. If they can do that, improvement in our communication testament surely follow. Men and women will always comm unicate differently, but at least if they understand the differences they can move forward. ? Work Cited Tannen, Deborah. â€Å"Sex, Lies, and Conversation. ” The Norton Mix. Ed. Sieg, Judy. sensitive York: W. W. Norton, 2012. Print.\r\n'